HIGHEST PAID “JUDGE” IN CA WORKS FOR SOCIAL SERVICES!!!


CORRECTION: TRANSPARENT CALIFORNIA DOES NOT LIST ANY OTHER JUDGES IN THE STATE AS OF YET. BUT THIS JUDGE IS THE HIGHEST PAID ADMINISTRATIVE/SOCIAL SERVICES JUDGE WITH REGARDS TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE. SOME STATE EMPLOYEES/AGENCIES DID NOT PROVIDE TRANSPARENT CALIFORNIA WITH THEIR INFORMATION.

First, take their regular bench pay, add overtime, “other” pay and benefits and you get $230,000 to always rule in favor of CPS. That means: sustain every petition, order the care, custody and control (of every child named in every petition), to the DIRECTOR of Public Social Services by declaring that each and every child named in a petition comes within the court’s jurisdiction, to OVERRULE any and all objections from the parents’ attorney (only the private pay attorneys EVER OBJECT since the “Defense Panel attorneys NEVER OBJECT), and to adopt all findings and orders that the Department includes in their attachment to the report (and rather than adhering to Welfare & Institutions Code regarding the conduct of the “Judge” he/she gets away with simply stating, “I adopt the findings and orders contained on Page [blah blah] of the Detention Report.”  follow the law and regulations that say you SHALL examine the parents and/or any other person with relative information, you SHALL make paternity findings, you SHALL inquire as to the reasonable efforts put forth by the Department), This “Judge” is paid to make sure every child that comes before the court is denied the right to GO HOME.

355.  (a) At the jurisdictional hearing, the court shall first
consider only the question whether the minor is a person described by
Section 300. Any legally admissible evidence that is relevant to the
circumstances or acts that are alleged to bring the minor within the
jurisdiction of the juvenile court is admissible and may be received
in evidence. Proof by a preponderance of evidence must be adduced to
support a finding that the minor is a person described by Section
300. Objections that could have been made to evidence introduced
shall be deemed to have been made by a parent or guardian who is
present at the hearing and unrepresented by counsel, unless the court
finds that the parent or guardian has made a knowing and intelligent
waiver of the right to counsel. Objections that could have been made
to evidence introduced shall be deemed to have been made by an
unrepresented child.
   (b) A social study prepared by the petitioning agency, and hearsay
evidence contained in it, is admissible and constitutes competent
evidence upon which a finding of jurisdiction pursuant to Section 300
may be based, to the extent allowed by subdivisions (c) and (d).
   (1) For purposes of this section, "social study" means any written
report furnished to the juvenile court and to all parties or their
counsel by the county probation or welfare department in any matter
involving the custody, status, or welfare of a minor in a dependency
proceeding pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 300) to
Article 12 (commencing with Section 385), inclusive.
   (2) The preparer of the social study shall be made available for
cross-examination upon a timely request by a party. The court may
deem the preparer available for cross-examination if it determines
that the preparer is on telephone standby and can be present in court
within a reasonable time of the request.
   (3) The court may grant a reasonable continuance not to exceed 10
days upon request by any party if the social study is not provided to
the parties or their counsel within a reasonable time before the
hearing.
   (c) (1) If a party to the jurisdictional hearing raises a timely
objection to the admission of specific hearsay evidence contained in
a social study, the specific hearsay evidence shall not be sufficient
by itself to support a jurisdictional finding or any ultimate fact
upon which a jurisdictional finding is based, unless the petitioner
establishes one or more of the following exceptions:
   (A) The hearsay evidence would be admissible in any civil or
criminal proceeding under any statutory or decisional exception to
the prohibition against hearsay.
   (B) The hearsay declarant is a minor under 12 years of age who is
the subject of the jurisdictional hearing. However, the hearsay
statement of a minor under 12 years of age shall not be admissible if
the objecting party establishes that the statement is unreliable
because it was the product of fraud, deceit, or undue influence.
   (C) The hearsay declarant is a peace officer as defined by Chapter
4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal
Code, a health practitioner described in paragraphs (21) to (28),
inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 11165.7 of the Penal Code, a
social worker licensed pursuant to Chapter 14 (commencing with
Section 4991) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, or
a teacher who holds a credential pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing
with Section 44200) of Part 25 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the
Education Code. For the purpose of this subdivision, evidence in a
declaration is admissible only to the extent that it would otherwise
be admissible under this section or if the declarant were present and
testifying in court.
   (D) The hearsay declarant is available for cross-examination. For
purposes of this section, the court may deem a witness available for
cross-examination if it determines that the witness is on telephone
standby and can be present in court within a reasonable time of a
request to examine the witness.
   (2) For purposes of this subdivision, an objection is timely if it
identifies with reasonable specificity the disputed hearsay evidence
and it gives the petitioner a reasonable period of time to meet the
objection prior to a contested hearing.
   (d) This section shall not be construed to limit the right of a
party to the jurisdictional hearing to subpoena a witness whose
statement is contained in the social study or to introduce admissible
evidence relevant to the weight of the hearsay evidence or the
credibility of the hearsay declarant.



355.1.  (a) Where the court finds, based upon competent professional
evidence, that an injury, injuries, or detrimental condition
sustained by a minor is of a nature as would ordinarily not be
sustained except as the result of the unreasonable or neglectful acts
or omissions of either parent, the guardian, or other person who has
the care or custody of the minor, that finding shall be prima facie
evidence that the minor is a person described by subdivision (a),
(b), or (d) of Section 300.
   (b) Proof that either parent, the guardian, or other person who
has the care or custody of a minor who is the subject of a petition
filed under Section 300 has physically abused, neglected, or cruelly
treated another minor shall be admissible in evidence.
   (c) The presumption created by subdivision (a) constitutes a
presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence.
56.  After hearing the evidence, the court shall make a finding,
noted in the minutes of the court, whether or not the minor is a
person described by Section 300 and the specific subdivisions of
Section 300 under which the petition is sustained. If it finds that
the minor is not such a person, it shall order that the petition be
dismissed and the minor be discharged from any detention or
restriction theretofore ordered. If the court finds that the minor is
such a person, it shall make and enter its findings and order
accordingly.
358.  (a) After finding that a child is a person described in
Section 300, the court shall hear evidence on the question of the
proper disposition to be made of the child. Prior to making a finding
required by this section, the court may continue the hearing on its
own motion, the motion of the parent or guardian, or the motion of
the child, as follows:
   (1) If the child is detained during the continuance, and the
social worker is not alleging that subdivision (b) of Section 361.5
is applicable, the continuance shall not exceed 10 judicial days. The
court may make an order for detention of the child or for the child'
s release from detention, during the period of continuance, as is
appropriate.
   (2) If the child is not detained during the continuance, the
continuance shall not exceed 30 days after the date of the finding
pursuant to Section 356. However, the court may, for cause, continue
the hearing for an additional 15 days.
   (3) If the social worker is alleging that subdivision (b) of
Section 361.5 is applicable, the court shall continue the proceedings
for a period not to exceed 30 days. The social worker shall notify
each parent of the content of subdivision (b) of Section 361.5 and
shall inform each parent that if the court does not order
reunification a permanency planning hearing will be held, and that
his or her parental rights may be terminated within the timeframes
specified by law.
   (b) Before determining the appropriate disposition, the court
shall receive in evidence the social study of the child made by the
social worker, any study or evaluation made by a child advocate
appointed by the court, and other relevant and material evidence as
may be offered, including, but not limited to, the willingness of the
caregiver to provide legal permanency for the child if reunification
is unsuccessful. In any judgment and order of disposition, the court
shall specifically state that the social study made by the social
worker and the study or evaluation made by the child advocate
appointed by the court, if there be any, has been read and considered
by the court in arriving at its judgment and order of disposition.
Any social study or report submitted to the court by the social
worker shall include the individual child's case plan developed
pursuant to Section 16501.1.
   (c) If the court finds that a child is described by subdivision
(h) of Section 300 or that subdivision (b) of Section 361.5 may be
applicable, the court shall conduct the dispositional proceeding
pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 361.5.


For the complete W&I Codes (California) go to: CA W&I Codes

THIS COURT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IT IS NOT EVEN LEGAL (LIKE THEY TRY TO MAKE CRIMINAL COURT TO BE). IT IS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, or Civil Law, AS IF FAMILIES ARE A COMMODITY. Here: 

48.  The provisions of Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 469) of
Title 6 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to variance
and amendment of pleadings in civil actions shall apply to petitions
and proceedings under this chapter, to the same extent and with the
same effect as if proceedings under this chapter were civil actions.

This court is not even like FAMILY COURT and orders are NOT SIGNED (at least not back when our case was active in 2007-2012) therefore, actual custody by the Department is NOT LEGAL. For example, in Family Court you get a signed and sealed Order granting or outlining custody and control of the children. Let’s say you file for divorce and custody of the children and after a long or short battle, you are awarded full custody of the children with your ex getting supervised visits every other weekend. So then one day your ex goes to the children’s school and signs them out and takes them home and when you go to pick them up from school they are not there and the office tells you that your ex picked them up (of course you should have provided the school with a copy of the order but let’s say you forgot). Now, you call your ex and say you are coming to get the children and they say, “No, I’m not letting them go.” But you have legal rights to call the police, show them a copy of the signed and court-stamped order and they will assist you in getting your kids back from your ex. But if you don’t have a copy of the order, they will not assist you. Luckily, if the courthouse is open, you can easily go there and get a copy and show it to the police and then they will help you. In Juvenile Court, CPS never gets SIGNED ORDERS but the police will still assist them! To compare further, let’s say that your ex files for divorce and custody of the children. Let’s say he is allowed to rent a courtroom and pay a “Judge” and a bailiff and pay the attorneys including the one that represents YOU (and then frown and be harder on you if you pay for your own attorney). How fair would that be? THIS IS THE WAY JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT OPERATES!

IN FACT, ALL STATE COURTS ARE SET UP THIS WAY. THE STATE, I.E. “THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. JOE AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY”. THE STATE PAYS THE JUDGE’S SALARY AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S SALARY AND THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S SALARY. NO WONDER THE CONVICTION RATE IS SO HIGH! This was the single biggest mistake in our “justice system”, providing an attorney if you cannot afford one. Private attorneys would have to charge a great deal less for representation but would that be a BAD thing? 

Here is a clip showing the highest paid CA Judge is also a CPS Judge.

highestpaidJudgeCA

Got another restraining order against me for writing and speaking the truth about CPS.


I guess this means I haven’t stopped.  Taking my son away just so you could put money in your pockets,  is the reason I will never stop exposing CPS.  We are continually looking for tips, links, or eye witness reports of the UN-American activities by CPS, County Counsel, or any of the lawyers that pretend to care about children in court and not do a thing.   My attorney did not ask any questions that would increase the credibility as to how we raise our son.  Instead he asked questions that played into the stereotype profiling.  These attorneys don’t fight for us in CPS court they feed us to the wolves, I felt in the CPS courtroom the entire case was choreographed.   Letting the adoptive parents sit in the court just topped it off when my rights were not even terminated this is the strongest indication that everything was planned.

have had some great people willing to study the law about these CPS cases and this has helped them so much. The books are there so is anyone needs legal guides, law books,  we have numerous links and places to get books on the law for free.  I want all parents to have the chance that was stolen from my wife and I by some very heartless people who care about no no one only money.  Now that I have experience first hand, I have truly experienced the worst in man kind.  I never thought the entire court system of CPS would sell children or get involved where they should not be. To tell you the truth CPS should never end taking any child unless a child has gotten hurt from neglect.  Based on all the overwhelming evidence against CPS and the JV court system it is only a matter of time for these people to be looking for a job.  SELLING CHILDREN FOR FEDERAL MONEY ,  A child that gets hurt or killed doesn’t matter to CPS or these judges,  I will never stop exposing this court system.

I will never shut up, I will continue to fight until my death because it is not right on every level that a man would pass a law to take away a child and allow a company to profit from it. The people who pretend that it wouldn’t become corrupt are freaking kidding them selves. The lawyers that work for CPS could never find another job because they know what they have done  by pretending that there is any validity to CPS at all anymore and I am not sure there ever was and I have been around these people for a very long time. They came into my house and only picked the children from my second wife and I but left the children from my first wife who’s mother was very well established with that very CPS office and no one see”s the connection. HOW OBVIOUSLY CORRUPT CAN YOU BE TO UPHOLD THIS CRIME AGAINST PARENTS AND STEAL THEIR CHILD is everyone in the court system completely corrupt?  Don’t you people ever wonder what would happen if this happened to you.

What I find outrageous these days, that people still have such a lack of morality that they will pretend they haven’t heard of CPS stealing children from good homes.  The show I had to sit through today was so insulting and everyone knew it. At this day in age that a person would have to sit through a court proceeding and listen to people rob you blind. They should just use a gun and kill me, it would be easier. My son was stolen and from a good home and everyone thinks I am just going to watch it happen without making the whole world aware of it, not this father, A Lawyer who did his research would know only a person who truly cares about his child would continue to fight at all cost not someone who is just trying to justify things.

How can anyone think I would go to all this effort of finding case law and research of CPS crimes to make this stuff up? That is the crazy argument I had to listen to today.  This is to cruel to be made up.  If for a second you think CPS isn’t like this, don’t be lazy, look  it up. Look up the thousands of parents still fighting for their children even though low life attorney’s who know better still continue to tell people, I don’t have any evidence that CPS steals children, I can’t face up to what I did, or can’t deal with my responsibility for the things I may have done. How much more evidence will be enough to WAKE PEOPLE up OR tell the American people to get off their ass and face up to the fact that their children are being stolen and sold by the single biggest trafficker of children in history.

People have been told countless times and still everyone keeps saying it won’t ever happen to me. Then why are 800,000 that is eight hundred thousand children a year in the united states are stolen out of their homes and the news doesn’t report it. Now go ahead ask me how I know this the Government keeps totals and in order to get funding it must increase by 5 percent a year to set the budget for next year. I know this stuff because it happened to me and every time I see another child get taken from a good home. I ask myself what is it going to take to get people to wake up and fight back, I am only one person. I am not asleep, I pay attention. I know the TV is more interesting and I will not get a second thought until another child is stolen, a child you would protect at any cost right, and yet you don’t even have a chance to fight for your child because you don’t know who the threat is yet.and these people will ruin anyone.

My answer to the attorney’s who say I don’t own up to my responsibility.  My answer for you, not only do I deal with my responsibility but I deal with your irresponsibility to your client and industry that you so graciously take money from even when you know a child is suffering the consequence.  One thing I was taught as a child and I would have taught my child if given the chance, never give up the things you know are right even if told to do so.  This is how people become nothing under NAZI boot heals,  I would rather die for my principles than cater to corruption. You will say something typical again but I will not go away their is something far more important here than me shutting my mouth.  PARENTS ARE LOSING THEIR CHILDREN and until attorney’s stand up and say no I will not help you steal another child this country is going to end up COMPLETELY ROTTEN and you judges out there who approve this corrupt way of life. Don’t you want to live in a place of decency and made up of good people? Why are you letting this happen when you know it is wrong.  Just because I am not at the top of my class or a judge doesn’t mean I am not well grounded in life. I know who I am and I know what is right so you go ahead do what you will to me, but I have to face my maker alone,  I know what she will say to me,  so do what you have to do, I am the man I want to be.

If you second guess anything I am saying you will lose. Ask your self what I will lose or gain by telling you this?  The answer nothing,  they have already taken it and I would be lying if I said I don’t get a satisfaction out of helping parents and children to stay or get away from CPS.  When attorneys have beaten CPS they have lost their children, that is why a good attorney will go up against CPS if he has children or close friends who do. If you think I am lying look it up  the information is out there, people don’t make up things like that, it is to horrible to be made up. CPS WILL TAKE WHAT THEY WANT IF YOUR CHILD BECOMES THE TARGET.

We were up against another show for CPS again to day and they will not stop trying to shut me up.  They can’t because I tell the truth. CPS has been indicted so many times by the grand jury, investigated by the FBI and still people will say I don’t have any evidence to say the things I am saying. If this is you welcome to earth because you just got here. On this planet CPS steals children. WAKE UP PEOPLE.

It is now legal for CPS to steal your children and sell them for Federal money because there are plenty of unscrupulous people who find out and are just fine with knowing the truth and will even file a restraining order against the parents to help cover it up. as a matter of fact I know of a couple who adopted a child, I wont mention any names but these people found out the truth and instead of contact the parents and saying sorry you were wronged, and it is obvious you were wronged because you keep staying in there and fighting any parent who keeps fighting against those odds the just might deserve a little courtesy.

The parent I am talking about wrote a letter to the adoptive parents asking just to be able to visit or to make sure the child knew his parent didn’t give up on him, because the child deserves to know his parent didn’t just let him go, he was taken. Amazing as it is, these people stated that the birth parents couldn’t except what they did and just deal with it. WOULD THEY JUST WALK AWAY FROM A HUMAN BEING WHO DESERVES TO KNOW THE TRUTH?  I bet they would just walk away.  You know, I bet it wouldn’t be to hard to except if the parents didn’t have absolute proof that the CPS worker submitted a criminal record of another man in the same city with the same name but different middle name,and 10 years older that would be their first clue that the parents weren’t lying.

You see there is a moral struggle here inside of this person.  I bet he would like to just walk away and not run a back ground check on everyone in his sons life but bet he won’t.  You see I know him almost like it was myself speaking.  I will bet he will end up winning his law suit against CPS because it is right and like his mom always said, “what is right is right and nothing can change that not ever”.

The part about this story I think is disgusting, the attorney sat in that court room and this attorney is very well informed on CPS and he knows just how bad they really are and yet he still lied to his clients.  He way over charged them for a proceeding that they could have just represented themselves. Like I said these people that had their son stolen they are not stupid and won’t do anything to cause their son or the parents any harm.

One thing that I have to make abundantly clear and I hope everyone understands this:

If you ever adopt a child CPS will treat you just like the person they took the child from in the first place if you ever call them for help, they will not take it as if you need help, they will take it as a sign that you are their next target for funding.   I am not just talking hot air, I know these people and know what they do.  If you think just because they helped you adopt a child once they will always be their for you they won’t.  The one thing you need to know is CPS is never to be trusted EVER.  These people will not only destroy you but they will destroy your reputation,  your business and your life all to make a few hundred thousand in federal funds.

I have stated it so many times to people and until CPS is shut down I will not shut up.  I owe it to my son and every single child stolen to be loud about it so this “legal” kidnapping STOPS.  People don’t trust government at all but they will pretend to trust CPS when they put a child in their home.  Is this self deception

I wish I could warn the entire country about CPS but even if I did there are still people who will say that could never be me. You know it doesn’t have to be you CPS will just use some other person’s criminal record. Do you think if everyone in this country just woke up and said, “Know what? I will treat my child perfect forever.” Do you think CPS would go out of business? NO they wouldn’t. But they would grab very adoptable children by claiming the parents were drug addicts. Let me ask you, do you or have you ever taken prescription pain killers? How about Xanax? And did you drive? Drive with a child in the car? How about just simply being at home taking care of the kids? Well, if you got in an accident and they drug tested you it would be positive for opiates or benzodiazapines.and you could be charged with driving under the influence and your child taken away or if someone made a false report to the hotline and came to the house and asked you to take a mouth swab drug test, they would take your kids and you would have to do all of their programs. Do you drink? Does your spouse drink? Have you consumed alcohol while your children were around? What if you were entertaining and your child was playing or skateboarding and fell and had to go to the hospital? Then when you get there and speak to the doctor he smells alcohol on your breath and calls CPS. They would take your kid and make you go through their substance abuse classes, parenting classes, counseling, anger management and whatever else they throw at you.  And you STILL MIGHT NOT GET YOUR KID BACK if they are good kids and “very adorable and adoptable”. This is real and it happens to thousands and thousands of people.

I tell you what I don’t have to say anymore.  I will give you a link to a site CPS social workers talk to each other some times they don’t disguise what is said and you be the judge of what they say.  It will change you out look on raising children.  The site is called http://www.socialjerk.com   People please just listen and except this fact. Don’t call CPS and ever expect a good outcome, these people are hired because of their ability to disconnect and not use their better judgement, A type personality, aggressive, argumentative , antisocial, sociopaths and most don’t have children, people with children do not last at CPS because they become conscious of what they do to other parents.  I don’t like if truly in this since to be right.  I give the information out tell you where to look and still people say, I am lying.. If someone is giving information before you call them a liar, check out what they are saying, It might save you from losing your son.  I am telling everyone not one person, so not trust these people because you can’t even trust them to keep information private.