I am amazed, and bewildered. I get countless emails and phone calls each and every day from people all across the U.S., begging for help, pleading for someone to hear them and their story. Sometimes I get overwhelmed with grief for these people, going through exactly what my family went through and some even worse that what my family went though. Last night I visited with a couple who live near me. In fact, they live in the house where I lived a few years back, while we were fooling CPS into believing that I lived in Arizona so that they would close the case. (Which worked by the way.) This couple, they are just KIDS themselves, 19 years old. Adorable, kind, responsible, and sponges for knowledge. I didn’t even have to school them on what CPS is all about. They know, just from going through this for 3 months now. I won’t get into the details of their story for fear that the court cohorts will use it against them. I already believe that they have somehow linked us together as CPS already had their address in their system as one of my addresses. I really hope that has not been a factor in this because I did not know them before yesterday. I really feel for these kids. Kids trying to do the honorable and responsible thing, having an unplanned baby so young. Many people feel that having a baby so young somehow limits or hinders being successful in life. I don’t agree with that, and neither do these kids. The anguish on their faces, their extremely supportive aunt right by their side, fighting for them, it breaks my heart. CPS preys upon good, decent people and it sickens me to no end.
So, I got off of my original thought. I have a program that traces each and every IP that visits our site. I can see what ISP you are using and whether or not the IP is registered to a business. People from all over the world visit our site, from the UK to Australia to even Ecuador and Finland! Where the heck is Oman? I’m wondering why they are interested in our site as I tend to focus this child stealing, federally funded kidnapping ring to events within the continental U.S. Don’t get me wrong, this is happening everywhere. I hope those visiting from other countries are getting an idea of what their own country might be doing. Of course, what I am curious about is those visitors from the Arizona State Government, The Cocoa-Cola Company and Amazon. Regardless of where you are or why you are here, WELCOME! If you have any questions or concerns, just ask! I will tell you anything you want to know but in return, tell me what your purpose is for checking out our site. My curiosity is killing me!
I do sell things on Amazon and when I send out packages, I include a “Public Service Announcement” which advertises our site but I never include the flyer with international packages. Often, I take a loss the items I sell, not a very profitable business, I know. I undercut everyone just to get the sale so I can get the word out about CPS stealing children. I am certain I will have to explain that to some official someday. I have receipts for all of the items I sell so it shouldn’t be too difficult. I buy many things that are in the clearance bins at local retailers or items on sale. Sometimes I have to pay full price for an item because I know it is a good seller and will sell fast, therefore I take a loss on the item just to send out the flyers. Rather than buy a mailing list, I figure if I can make a buck or two off a buy one get one free deal and then sell it online for a little lower than the lowest online price, great! On the side, I clean houses and do invoicing for contractors. I also prepare court documents for a small fee so that is how I can afford to buy the items I sell. It’s all legit and on the up and up. I have a reseller’s license as well. So there!
Now, to the Arizona State Government: STOP STEALING CHILDREN! YOU KNOW YOU DO IT, ARE YOU FEELING A BIT THREATENED BY EVERYONE KNOWING?
To our faithful and railroaded parents and readers: If you hear that I have committed suicide don’t believe it.
COME HELP RAISE AWARENESS AND PROTEST AGAINST FORCED ADOPTIONS!
WHERE: Ontario Convention Center 2000 E. Convention Center Way, Ontario, CA 91764
WHEN: Thursday, November 20, 2014 [10:30 am]
WHAT TO BRING: SIGNS, SIGNS AND MORE SIGNS!
If you can’t bring a sign, no worries but if you can, get a posterboard, a black Sharpie and a red Sharpie and write your child’s name on it and say, “My child was stolen by _____ County Child Protective Services” or something or whatever you want to write on it. Bring your VOICE!
INVOLUNTARY/FORCED ADOPTION PEACEFUL PROTEST! Thursday. Nov 20, 2014 the Ontario Convention Center Located at 2000 E. Convention Center Way in Ontario, CALIFORNIA 91764. Children and family services is hosting the event for final adoption. As many of you know a lot of these children are INVOLUNTARY adoptions and many parents want their children! Many families had rights terminated unjustly and without due process in the juvenile courts many of these children end up abused and we must let the world know this is happening and its a kids for cash scheme via our government! Not all the adoptions however we know MANY children are being adopted out without due process and having parental rights terminated unjustly as well as loving fit family members wanting their family are being denied! We must raise awareness and EXPOSE what is happening to our children and families! Lets all of us advertise and sponsor a protest at the convention center. I know WE CAN DO IT! We can keep it peaceful. Lets do this people!!!! this is our spot lets make it a large!!! this is HUGE! “LET’S KEEP THE HEAT ON” LETS JOIN TOGETHER! please only accept invitation if you are going! This is in STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF ONTARIO
PROOF OF WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING, COMPARING THE JUVENILE COURT TO A CIRCUS!:
U.S. federal laws that govern CPS agencies include:
In 1690, in what is now the United States, there were criminal court cases involving child abuse. In 1692, states and municipalities identified care for abused and neglected children as the responsibility of local government and private institutions.In 1696, The Kingdom of England first used the legal principle of parens patriae, which gave the royal crown care of “charities, infants, idiots, and lunatics returned to the chancery.” This principal of parens patriae has been identified as the statutory basis for U.S. governmental intervention in families’ child rearing practices.
In 1825, states enacted laws giving social-welfare agencies the right to remove neglected children from their parents and from the streets. These children were placed in almshouses, in orphanages and with other families. In 1835, the Humane Society founded the National Federation of Child Rescue agencies to investigate child maltreatment. In the late-19th century, private child protection agencies – modeled after existing animal protection organizations – developed to investigate reports of child maltreatment, present cases in court and advocate for child welfare legislation.
In 1853, the Children’s Aid Society was founded in response to the problem of orphaned or abandoned children living in New York. Rather than allow these children to become institutionalized or continue to live on the streets, the children were placed in the first “foster” homes, typically with the intention of helping these families work their farms.
In 1874, the first case of child abuse was criminally prosecuted in what has come to be known as the “case of Mary Ellen.” Outrage over this case started an organized effort against child maltreatment In 1909, President Theodore Roosevelt convened the White House Conference on Child Dependency, which created a publicly funded volunteer organization to “establish and publicize standards of child care.” By 1926, 18 states had some version of county child welfare boards whose purpose was to coordinate public and private child related work. Issues of abuse and neglect were addressed in the Social Security Act in 1930, which provided funding for intervention for “neglected and dependent children in danger of becoming delinquent.” 
In 1912, the federal Children’s Bureau was established to manage federal child welfare efforts, including services related to child maltreatment. In 1958, amendments to the Social Security Act mandated that states fund child protection efforts. In 1962, professional and media interest in child maltreatment was sparked by the publication of C. Henry Kempe and associates’ “The battered child syndrome” in JAMA. By the mid-1960s, in response to public concern that resulted from this article, 49 U.S. states passed child-abuse reporting laws. In 1974, these efforts by the states culminated in the passage of the federal “Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act” (CAPTA; Public Law 93-247) providing federal funding for wide-ranging federal and state child-maltreatment research and services. In 1980, Congress passed the first comprehensive federal child protective services act, the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-272), which focused on state economic incentives to substantially decrease the length and number of foster care placements.
Partly funded by the federal government, Child Protective Services (CPS) agencies were first established in response to the 1974CAPTA which mandated that all states establish procedures to investigate suspected incidents of child maltreatment.
In the 1940s and 1950s, due to improved technology in diagnostic radiology, the medical profession began to take notice of what they believed to be intentional injuries. In 1961, C. Henry Kempe began to further research this issue, eventually identifying and coining the term battered child syndrome. At this same time, there were also changing views about the role of the child in society, fueled in part by the civil rights movement.
In 1973, Congress took the first steps toward enacting federal legislature to address the issue of child abuse. The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act was passed in 1974, which required states “to prevent, identify and treat child abuse and neglect.”
Shortly thereafter, in 1978, the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) was passed in response to concerns that large numbers of Native American children were being separated from their tribes and placed in foster care. This legislation not only opened the door for consideration of cultural issues while stressing ideas that children should be with their families, leading to the beginnings offamily preservation programs. In 1980, the Adoption Assistance Act was introduced as a way to manage the high numbers of children in placement. Although this legislation addressed some of the complaints from earlier pieces of legislation around ensuring due process for parents, these changes did not alleviate the high numbers of children in placement or continuing delays in permanence. This led to the introduction of the home visitation models, which provided funding to private agencies to provide intensive family preservation services.
In addition to family preservation services, the focus of federal child welfare policy changed to try to address permanence for the large numbers of foster children care. Several pieces of federal legislation attempted to ease the process of adoption including Adoption Assistance Act; the 1988 Child Abuse Prevention, Adoption, and Family Services Act; and the 1992 Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, Adoption, and Family Services Act. The 1994 Multi-Ethnic Placement Act, which was revised in 1996 to add the Interethnic Placement Provisions, also attempted to promote permanency through adoption, creating regulations that adoptions could not be delayed or denied due to issues of race, color, or national origin of the child or the adoptive parent.
All of these policies led up to the 1997 Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA), much of which guides current practice. Changes in the Adoptions and Safe Families Act showed an interest in both protecting children’s safety and developing permanency.This law requires counties to provide “reasonable efforts” (treatment) to preserve or reunify families, but also shortened time lines required for permanence, leading to termination of parental rights should these efforts fail. ASFA introduced the idea of “concurrent planning” which demonstrated attempts to reunify families as the first plan, but to have a back-up plan so as not to delay permanency for children.
Comparison to other similar systems
The United Kingdom has a comprehensive child welfare system under which Local Authorities have duties and responsibilities towards children in need in their area. This covers provision of advice and services, accommodation and care of children who become uncared for, and also the capacity to initiate proceedings for the removal of children from their parents care/care proceedings. The criteria for the latter is ‘significant harm’ which covers physical, sexual and emotional abuse and neglect. In appropriate cases the Care Plan before the Court will be for adoption. The Local Authorities also run adoption services both for children put up for adoption voluntarily and those becoming available for adoption through Court proceedings. The basic legal principle in all public and private proceedings concerning children, under the Children Act 1989, is that the welfare of the child is paramount. In recognition of attachment issues, social work good practice requires a minimal number of moves and the 1989 Children Act enshrines the principle that delay is inimical to a child’s welfare. Care proceedings have a time frame of 40 weeks and concurrent planning is required. The final Care Plan put forward by the Local Authority is required to provide a plan for permanence, whether with parents, family members, long-term foster parents or adopters. Nevertheless, ‘drift’ and multiple placements still occur as many older children are difficult to place or maintain in placements. The role of Independent Visitor, a voluntary post, was created in the United Kingdom under the 1989 Children Act to befriend and assist children and young people in care.
In England, Wales and Scotland, there never has been a statutory obligation to report alleged child abuse to the Police. However both the Children Act 1989 and 2004 makes clear a statutory obligation on all professionals to report suspected child abuse.
The statutory guidance Working Together to Safeguard Children 2006 created the role of Local Authority Designated Officer, This officer is responsible for managing allegations of abuse against adults who work with children (Teachers, Social Workers,Church leaders, Youth Workers etc.).
Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCB’s) are responsible ensuring agencies and professionals,in their area,effectively safeguard and promote the welfare of children. In the event of the death or serious injury of a child, LSCB’s can initiate a ‘Serious Case Review’ aimed at identifying agency failings and improving future practice.
The planned ContactPoint database, under which information on children is shared between professionals, has been halted by the newly elected coalition government (May 2010). The database was aimed at improving information sharing across agencies. Lack of information sharing had been identified as a failing in numerous high profile child death cases. Critics of the scheme claimed it was evidence of a ‘big brother state’ and too expensive to introduce.
Working Together to Safeguard Children 2006 (updated in 2010) and the subsequent ‘The Protection of Children in England: A Progress Report’ (Laming, 2009) continue to promote the sharing of data between those working with vulnerable children.
A child in suitable cases can be made a ward of court and no decisions about the child or changes in its life can be made without the leave of the High Court.
In England the Murder of Victoria Climbié was largely responsible for various changes in child protection in England, including the formation of the Every Child Matters programme in 2003. A similar programme – Getting it Right for Every Child – GIRFEC was established in Scotland in 2008.
In Ontario, services are provided by independent Children’s Aid Societies. The societies receive funding from, and are under the supervision of the Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services. However, they are regarded as a Non-governmental organization (NGO) which allows the CAS a large degree of autonomy from interference or direction in the day to day running of CAS by the Ministry. The Child and Family Services Review Board exists to investigate complaints against CAS and maintains authority to act against the societies.
The Patronato Nacional de la Infancia (PANI) is responsible for Child Protection in Costa Rica.
The agency was founded in 1930 by Dr. Luis Felipe Gonzalez Flores, a Costa Rican magnate at the time. It was founded to combat infant mortality, that at the time, was rampant in Costa Rica. The idea was to put infants up for adoption that the mother could not afford to support (abortion is a crime in Costa Rica).
Today the focus is on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The agency still favors adoption, since abortion is illegal in Costa Rica.
Effects of early maltreatment on children in child welfare
Children with histories of maltreatment, such as physical and psychological neglect, physical abuse, and sexual abuse, are at risk of developing psychiatric problems. Such children are at risk of developing a disorganized attachment.Disorganized attachment is associated with a number of developmental problems, including dissociative symptoms, as well as depressive, anxiety, and acting-out symptoms.
Standards for Reporting
Generally speaking, a report must be made when an individual knows or has reasonable cause to believe or suspect that a child has been subjected to abuse or neglect. These standards guide mandatory reporters in deciding whether to make a report to child protective services.
Persons Responsible for the Child
In addition to defining acts or omissions that constitute child abuse or neglect, several states’ statutes provide specific definitions of persons who can get reported to child protective services as perpetrators of abuse or neglect. These are persons who have some relationship or regular responsibility for the child. This generally includes parents, guardians, foster parents, relatives, or legal guardians. Once taken away from home, the stated goal of CPS is to reunite the child with their family. In some cases, due to the nature of abuse children are not able to see or converse with the abusers. If parents fail to complete Court Ordered terms and conditions, the children in care may never return home.
Child Protective Services Statistics
The United States government’s Administration for Children and Families reported that in 2004 approximately 3.5 million children were involved in investigations of alleged abuse or neglect in the US, while an estimated 872,000 children were determined to have been abused or neglected, and an estimated 1,490 children died that year because of abuse or neglect. In 2007, 1,760 children died as the result of child abuse and neglect. Child abuse impacts the most vulnerable populations, with children under age five years accounting for 76% of fatalities. In 2008, 8.3 children per 1000 were victims of child abuse and neglect and 10.2 children per 1000 were in out of home placement.
On September 30, 2010, there were approximately 400,000 children in foster care in the U.S. of which 36% percent were ages 5 and under. During that same period, almost 120,000 birth to five year-olds entered foster care and a little under 100,000 exited foster care. U.S. Child Protective Services (CPS) received a little over 2.5 million reports of child maltreatment in 2009 of which 61.9% were assigned to an investigation. Research using national data on recidivism indicates that 22% of children were rereported within a 2-year period and that 7% of these rereports were substantiated.
Child Protective Services Recidivism in the United States
In order to understand CPS recidivism in the U.S., there are several terms that readers must familiarize themselves with. Two often-used terms in CPS recidivism are rereport (also known as rereferral) and recurrence. Either of the two can occur after an initial report of child abuse or neglect called an index report. Although the definition of rereport and recurrence is not consistent, the general difference is that a rereport is a subsequent report of child abuse or neglect after an initial report (also known as an index report) whereas recurrence refers to a confirmed (also known as substantiated) rereport after an initial report of child abuse and neglect. Borrowing from the definition used by Pecora et al. (2000), recidivism is defined as, “Recurring child abuse and neglect, the subsequent or repeated maltreatment of a child after identification to public authorities.” It is important to highlight that this definition is not all-inclusive because it does not include abused children who are not reported to authorities.
There are three main sources of recidivism data in the U.S.—the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS), the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW), and the National Incidence Study (NIS)—and they all have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. NCANDS was established in 1974, and it consists of administrative data of all reports of suspected child abuse and neglect investigated by CPS. NSCAW was established in 1996 and is similar to NCANDS in that it only includes reports of child abuse and neglect investigated by CPS, but it adds clinical measures related to child and family well-being that NCANDS is lacking. NIS was established in 1974, and it consists of data collected from CPS as well. However, it attempts to gather a more comprehensive picture of the incidence of child abuse and neglect by collecting data from other reporting sources called community sentinels.
Brenda Scott, in her 1994 book Out of Control: Who’s Watching Our Child Protection Agencies, criticizes CPS, stating, “Child Protective Services is out of control. The system, as it operates today, should be scrapped. If children are to be protected in their homes and in the system, radical new guidelines must be adopted. At the core of the problem is the antifamily mindset of CPS. Removal is the first resort, not the last. With insufficient checks and balances, the system that was designed to protect children has become the greatest perpetrator of harm.”
An ongoing case about the Nastić family living in U.S. has received an intervention from the Serbian government. Children were taken away from their parents after their naked photos were found on the father’s computer. Such photos are common in Serbia culture. Furthermore, parents claim that their ethnic and religious rights have been violated – children are not permitted to speak Serbian, nor to meet with their parents for orthodox Christmas. They can meet only mother once a week. Children have suffered psychological traumas due to their separation from parents. Polygraph showed that father did not abuse children. Trial is set for January 26. Psychologists from Serbia stated that few hours of conversation with children are enough to see whether they have been abused. Children were taken from their family 7 months ago. FBI started an investigation against the CPS.
Senator Nancy Schaefer stated “The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in 1998 reported that six times :as many children died in foster care than in the general public and that once removed to official “safety”, these children are far more likely to :suffer abuse, including sexual molestation than in the general population. Think what that number is today ten years later!”
- The NCCAN report on “Perpetrators of Maltreatment”provides the following figures
Maltreatment per 100,000 US children CPS Parents Physical Abuse 160 59 Sexual Abuse 112 13 Neglect 410 241 Medical Neglect 14 12 Fatalities 6.4 1.5
Senator Schaefer also stated
- “that poor parents very often are targeted to lose their children because they do not have the where-with-all to hire lawyers and fight the system. Being poor does not mean you are not a good parent or that you do not love your child, or that your child should be removed and placed with strangers;
- that all parents are capable of making mistakes and that making a mistake does not mean your children are to be removed from the home. Even if the home is not perfect, it is home; and that’s where a child is the safest and where he or she wants to be, with family;
- that parenting classes, anger management classes, counseling referrals, therapy classes and on and on are demanded of parents with no compassion by the system even while the parents are at work and while their children are separated from them. (some times parents are required to pay for the programs) This can take months or even years and it emotionally devastates both children and parents. Parents are victimized by “the system” that makes a profit for holding children longer and “bonuses” for not returning children to their parents;
- that caseworkers and social workers are very often guilty of fraud. They withhold and destroy evidence. They fabricate evidence and they seek to terminate parental rights unnecessarily. However, when charges are made against Child Protective Services, the charges are ignored;
- that the separation of families and the “snatching of children” is growing as a business because local governments have grown accustomed to having these taxpayer dollars to balance their ever-expanding budgets;
- that Child Protective Services and Juvenile Court can always hide behind a confidentiality clause in order to protect their decisions and keep the funds flowing. There should be open records and “court watches”! Look who is being paid!
There are state employees, lawyers, court investigators, guardian ad litems, court personnel, and judges. There are psychologists, and psychiatrists, counselors, caseworkers, therapists, foster parents, adoptive parents, and on and on. All are looking to the children in state custody to provide job security. Parents do not realize that the social workers are the glue that hold “the system” together that funds the court, funds the court appointed attorneys, and the multiple other jobs including the “system’s” psychiatrists, therapists, their own attorneys and others.
- that The Adoption and the Safe Families Act, set in motion first in 1974 by Walter Mondale and later in 1997 by President Bill Clinton, offered cash “bonuses” to the states for every child they adopted out of foster care. In order to receive the “adoption incentive bonuses” local child protective services need more children. They must have merchandise (children) that sells and you must have plenty so the buyer can choose. Some counties are known to give a $4,000 to $6,000 bonus for each child adopted out to strangers and an additional $2,000 for a “special needs” child. Employees work to keep the federal dollars flowing;
- State Departments of Human Resources (DHR) and affiliates are given a baseline number of expected adoptions based on population. For every child DHR and CPS can get adopted, there is the bonus of $4,000 or maybe $6,000. But that is only the beginning figure in the formula in which each bonus is multiplied by the percentage that the State has managed to exceed its baseline adoption number. Therefore States and local communities work hard to reach their goals for increased numbers of adoptions for children in foster care.
- that there is double dipping. The funding continues as long as the child is out of the home. There is funding for foster care then when a child is placed with a new family, then “adoption bonus funds” are available. When a child is placed in a mental health facility and is on 16 drugs per day, like two children of a constituent of mine, more funds are involved and so is Medicaid;
- As you can see this program is ordered from the very top and run by Health and Human Resources. This is why victims of CPS get no help from their legislators. It explains why my bill, SB 415 suffered such defeat in the Judicial Committee, why I was cut off at every juncture. Legislators and Governors must remember who funds their paychecks.
- that there are no financial resources and no real drive to unite a family and help keep them together or provide effective care;
- that the incentive for social workers to return children to their parents quickly after taking them has disappeared and who in protective services will step up to the plate and say, “This must end! No one, because they are all in the system together and a system with no leader and no clear policies will always fail the children. Just look at the waste in government that is forced upon the tax payer;
- that the “Policy Manuel” is considered “the last word” for CPS/DFCS. However, it is too long, too confusing, poorly written and does not take the law into consideration;
- that if the lives of children were improved by removing them from their homes, there might be a greater need for protective services, but today children are not safer. Children, of whom I am aware, have been raped and impregnated in foster care;
- It is a known fact that children are in much more danger in foster care than they are in their own home even though home may not be perfect.
- that some parents are even told if they want to see their children or grandchildren, they must divorce their spouse. Many, who are under privileged, feeling they have no option, will divorce and then just continue to live together. This is an anti-family policy, but parents will do anything to get their children home with them. However, when the parents cooperate with Child Protective Services, their behavior is interpreted as guilt when nothing could be further from the truth.
- Fathers, (non-custodial parents) I must add, are often treated as criminals without access to visit or even see their own children and have child support payments strangling the very life out of them;
- that the Foster Parents Bill of Rights does not stress that a foster parent is there temporarily to care for a child until the child can be returned home. Many foster parents today use the Foster Parent Bill of Rights as a means to hire a lawyer and seek to adopt the child placed in their care from the real parents, who are desperately trying to get their child home and out of the system. Recently in Atlanta, a young couple learning to be new parents and loving it, were told that because of an anonymous complaint, their daughter would be taken into custody by the State DFCS. The couple was devastated and then was required by DFCS to take parenting classes, alcohol counseling and psychological evaluations if they wanted to get their child back. All of the courses cost money for which most parents are required to pay. While in their anxiety and turmoil to get their child home, the baby was left for hours in a car to die in the heat in her car seat by a foster parent who forgot about the child. This should never have happened. It is tragic. In many cases after the parents have jumped through all the hoops, they still do not get their child. As long as the child is not returned, there is money for the agency, for foster parents, for adoptive parents, and for the State.
- that tax dollars are being used to keep this gigantic system afloat, yet the victims, parents, grandparents, guardians and especially the children, are charged for the system’s services.
- that grandparents have called from all over the State of Georgia and from other states trying to get custody of their grandchildren. CPS claims relatives are contacted, but there are many many cases that prove differently. Grandparents who lose their grandchildren to strangers have lost their own flesh and blood. The children lose their family heritage and grandparents, and parents too, lose all connections to their heirs.
- that The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in 1998 reported that six times as many children died in foster care than in the general public and that once removed to official “safety”, these children are far more likely to suffer abuse, including sexual molestation than in the general population. Think what that number is today ten years later!
- That according to the California Little Hoover Commission Report in 2003, 30% to 70% of the children in California group homes do not belong there and should not have been removed from their homes.” 
The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services had itself been an object of reports of unusual numbers of poisonings, death, rapes and pregnancies of children under its care since 2004. The Texas Family and Protective Services Crisis Management Team was created by executive order after the critical report Forgotten Children of 2004.
Texas Child Protective Services was hit with a rare if not unprecedented legal sanction for a “groundless cause of action” and ordered to pay $32,000 of the Spring family’s attorney fees. Judge Schneider wrote in a 13-page order, “The offensive conduct by (CPS) has significantly interfered with the legitimate exercise of the traditional core functions of this court.”
2008 Raid of YFZ Ranch
In April 2008, the largest child protection action in American history raised questions as the CPS in Texas removed hundreds of minor children, infants, and women incorrectly believed to be children from the YFZ Ranch polygamist community, with the assistance of heavily armed police with an armored personnel carrier. Investigators, including supervisor Angie Voss convinced a judge that all of the children were at risk of child abuse because they were all being groomed for under-age marriage. The state supreme court disagreed, releasing most children back to their families. Investigations would result in criminal charges against some men in the community.
Gene Grounds of Victim Relief Ministries commended CPS workers in the Texas operation as exhibiting compassion, professionalism and caring concern. However, CPS performance was questioned by workers from the Hill Country Community Mental Health-Mental Retardation Center. One wrote “I have never seen women and children treated this poorly, not to mention their civil rights being disregarded in this manner” after assisting at the emergency shelter. Others who were previously forbidden to discuss conditions working with CPS later produced unsigned written reports expressed anger at the CPS traumatizing the children, and disregarding rights of mothers who appeared to be good parents of healthy, well-behaved children. CPS threatened some MHMR workers with arrest, and the entire mental health support was dismissed the second week due to being “too compassionate.” Workers believed poor sanitary conditions at the shelter allowed respiratory infections and chicken pox to spread.
CPS problem reports
The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, as with other states, had itself been an object of reports of unusual numbers of poisonings, death, rapes and pregnancies of children under its care since 2004. The Texas Family and Protective Services Crisis Management Team was created by executive order after the critical report Forgotten Children of 2004. Texas Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn made a statement in 2006 about the Texas foster care system. In Fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively 30, 38 and 48 foster children died in the state’s care. The number of foster children in the state’s care increased 24 percent to 32,474 in Fiscal 2005, while the number of deaths increased 60 percent. Compared to the general population, a child is four times more likely to die in the Texas foster care system. In 2004, about 100 children were treated for poisoning from medications; 63 were treated for rape that occurred while under state care including four-year old twin boys, and 142 children gave birth, though others believe Ms. Strayhorn’s report was not scientifically researched, and that major reforms need to be put in place to assure that children in the conservatorship of the state get as much attention as those at risk in their homes.
Disproportionality & Disparity in the Child Welfare System
In the United States, data suggests that a disproportionate number of minority children, particularly African American and Native American children, enter the foster care system. National data in the United States provides evidence that disproportionality may vary throughout the course of a child’s involvement with the child welfare system. Differing rates of disproportionality are seen at key decision points including the reporting of abuse, substantiation of abuse, and placement into foster care. Additionally, once they enter foster care, research suggests that they are likely to remain in care longer. Research has shown that there is no difference in the rate of abuse and neglect among minority populations when compared to Caucasian children that would account for the disparity. The Juvenile Justice system has also been challenged by disproportionate negative contact of minority children. Because of the overlap in these systems, it is likely that this phenomenon within multiple systems may be related.
In May 2007, the United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found in Rogers v. County of San Joaquin, No. 05-16071 that a CPS social worker who removed children from their natural parents into foster care without obtaining judicial authorization was acting without due process and without exigency (emergency conditions) violated the 14th Amendment and Title 42 United State Code Section 1983. The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution says that a state may not make a law that abridges “… the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” and no state may “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Title 42 United States Code Section 1983 states that citizens can sue in federal courts any person who acting under a color of law to deprive the citizens of their civil rights under the pretext of a regulation of a state, See.
In case of Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745, Supreme Court reviewed a case when Department of Social Services removed two younger children from their natural parents only because the parents had been previously found negligent toward their oldest daughter. When the third child was only three days old, DSS transferred him to a foster home on the ground that immediate removal was necessary to avoid imminent danger to his life or health. The Supreme Court vacated previous judgment and stated: “Before a State may sever completely and irrevocably the rights of parents in their natural child, due process requires that the State support its allegations by at least clear and convincing evidence. But until the State proves parental unfitness, the child and his parents share a vital interest in preventing erroneous termination of their natural relationship”.
A District of Columbia Court of Appeals concluded that the lower trial court erred in rejecting the relative custodial arrangement selected by the natural mother who tried to preserve her relationship with the child. The previous judgment granting the foster mother’s adoption petition was reversed, the case remanded to the trial court to vacate the orders granting adoption and denying custody, and to enter an order granting custody to the child’s relative.
In 2010 an ex-foster child was awarded $30 million by jury trial in California (Santa Clara County) for sexual abuse damages that happened to him in foster home from 1995 to 1999. The foster parent, John Jackson, was licensed by state despite the fact that he abused his own wife and son, overdosed on drugs and was arrested for drunken driving. In 2006, Jackson was convicted in Santa Clara County of nine counts of lewd or lascivious acts on a child by force, violence, duress, menace and fear and seven counts of lewd or lascivious acts on a child under 14, according to the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office. The sex acts he forced the children in his foster care to perform sent him to prison for 220 years. Later in 2010, Giarretto Institute, the private foster family agency responsible for licensing and monitoring Jackson’s foster home and others, also was found to be negligent and liable for 75 percent of the abuse that was inflicted on the victim, and Jackson was liable for the rest.
In 2009 Oregon Department of Human Services has agreed to pay $2 million into a fund for the future care of twins who were allegedly abused by their foster parents; it was the largest such settlement in the agency’s history. According to the civil rightssuit filed on request of twins’ adoptive mother in December 2007 in U.S. Federal Court, kids were kept in makeshift cages—cribs covered with chicken wire secured by duct tape—in a darkened bedroom known as “the dungeon.” The brother and sister often went without food, water or human touch. The boy, who had a shunt put into his head at birth to drain fluid, didn’t receive medical attention, so when police rescued the twins he was nearly comatose. The same foster family previously took in their care hundreds of other children over nearly four decades. DHS said the foster parents deceived child welfare workers during the checkup visits.
Several lawsuits were brought in 2008 against the Florida Department of Children & Families (DCF), accusing it of mishandling reports that Thomas Ferrara, 79, a foster parent, was molesting girls. The suits claimed that though there were records of sexual misconduct allegations against Ferrara in 1992, 1996, and 1999, the DCF continued to place foster children with Ferrara and his then-wife until 2000. Ferrara was arrested in 2001 after a 9-year-old girl told detectives he regularly molested her over two years and threatened to hurt her mother if she told anyone. Records show that Ferrara had as many as 400 children go through his home during his 16 years as a licensed foster parent from 1984 to 2000. Officials stated that the lawsuits over Ferrara end up costing the DCF almost $2.26 million. Similarly, in 2007 Florida‘s DCF paid $1.2 million to settle a lawsuit that alleged DCF ignored complaints that another mentally challenged Immokalee girl was being raped by her foster father, Bonifacio Velazquez, until the 15-year-old gave birth to a child.
In a class action lawsuit Charlie and Nadine H. v. McGreevey was filed in federal court by “Children’s Rights” New York organization on behalf of children in the custody of the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS). The complaint alleged violations of the children’s constitutional rights and their rights under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act, theChild Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, Early Periodic Screening Diagnosis and Treatment, 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, theAmericans with Disabilities Act, and the Multiethnic Placement Act (MEPA). In July 2002, the federal court granted plaintiffs’ experts access to 500 children’s case files, allowing plaintiffs to collect information concerning harm to children in foster care through a case record review. These files revealed numerous cases in which foster children were abused, and DYFS failed to take proper action. On June 9, 2004, the child welfare panel appointed by the parties approved the NJ State’s Reform Plan. The court accepted the plan on June 17, 2004. The same organization filed similar lawsuits against other states in recent years that caused some of the states to start child welfare reforms.
In 2007 Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick obtained a jury verdict against Orange County (California) and two of its social workers for violating her Fourteenth Amendment rights to familial association. The $4.9 million verdict grew to a $9.5 million judgment as the County lost each of its successive appeals. The case finally ended in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court denied Orange County’s request to overturn the verdict.
In April 2013, Child Protective Services in Sacramento sent in police to forcibly remove a 5-month-old baby from the care of parents.
Alex and Anna Nikolayev took their baby Sammy out of Sutter Memorial Hospital and sought a second opinion at Kaiser Permanente, a competing hospital, for Sammy’s flu-like symptoms. Police arrived at Kaiser and questioned the couple and doctors. Once Sammy had been fully cleared to leave the hospital, the couple went home, but the following day police arrived and took Sammy. On June 25, 2013 the case against the family was dismissed adn the family filed a lawsuit against CPS and the Sacramento Police Department.
In a nationwide study, researchers examined children in 595 families over a period of 9 years. They discovered that in the households where child abuse was substantiated by evidence, risk factors remained unchanged during interviews with the families.
- Child Welfare
- Cinderella effect
- Foster Care
- Child Abuse
- National Association of Social Workers
- Parenting Coordinator
Similar organizations in other countries
- Bureau Jeugdzorg and Raad voor de Kinderbescherming Netherlands
- Jugendamt Germany and Austria
- Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service England and Wales
- Patronato Nacional de la Infancia in Costa Rica
- Pecora et al. (1992), p. 231.
- Ibid., pp. 230-1.
- Ibid., p. 230.
- Pecora et al. (1992), pp. 230-31; Petr (1998), p. 126.
- Children’s Aid Society. “History”.
- Axinn, June; Levin,Herman (1997). Social Welfare: a history of the American response to need (4th ed.). White Plains, New York: Longman. ISBN 9780801317002.
- Ellett, Alberta J.; Leighninger, Leslie (10 August 2006). “What Happened? An historical perspective of the de-professionalization of child welfare practice with implications for policy and practice”. Journal of Public Child Welfare 1 (1): 3–34.doi:10.1300/J479v01n01_02.
- Crosson-Tower, Cynthia (1999). Understanding child abuse and neglect (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.ISBN 9780205287802.
- Laird & Michael (2006).
- Pecora et al. (1992), p. 232; Petr (1998), p. 126.
- Pecora et al. (1992), pp. 232-3; Petr (1998), pp. 126-7.
- “Child Protective Services – HISTORICAL OVERVIEW, CURRENT SYSTEM”.
- “Reporting Child Abuse – Child Protective Services”.
- Antler, S (1978). “Child Abuse: An emerging social priority”. Social Work 23: 58–61.
- Administration for Children & Families. “Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) of 1974 P.L. 93-247”. Child Welfare Information Gateway. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
- Limb, GE; Chance, T; Brown, EF (December 2004). “An empirical examination of the Indian Child Welfare Act and its impact on cultural and familial preservation for American Indian children”. Child Abuse & Neglect 28 (12): 1279–89.doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.06.012. PMID 15607770.
- Mitchell, LB; Barth, RP; Green, R; Wall, A; Biemer, P; Berrick, JD; Webb, MB (Jan–Feb 2005). “Child welfare reform in the United States: findings from a local agency survey.”. Child Welfare 84 (1): 5–24. PMID 15717771.
- Administration for Children & Families. “Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 P.L. 96-272”. Child Welfare Information Gateway. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
- Administration for Children & Families (2011). “Major Federal Legislation Concerned with Child Protection, Child Welfare, and Adoption”. Child Welfare Information Gateway. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
- Lincroft, Y.; Resher, J. (2006). “Undercounted and Underserved: Immigrant and refugee families in the child welfare system”. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
- Mitchell, Lorelei B.; Barth, Richard P.; Green, Rebecca; Wall, Ariana; Biemer, Paul; Berrick, Jill Duerr; Webb, Mary Bruce. “Child Welfare Reform in the United States: Findings from a Local Agency Survey”. Child Welfare 84 (1): 5–24 . ISSN 0009-4021.
- “About Ontario’s children’s aid societies”. Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services. Retrieved 19 April 2011.
- “Child and Family Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11”. E-laws.gov.on.ca. Retrieved 2013-11-15.
- “Complaints Against a Children’s Aid Society”. Child and Family Services Review Board. Retrieved 17 April 2011.
- Gauthier, L., Stollak, G., Messe, L., & Arnoff, J. (1996). Recall of childhood neglect and physical abuse as differential predictors of current psychological functioning. Child Abuse and Neglect 20, 549-559
- Malinosky-Rummell, R. & Hansen, D.J. (1993) Long term consequences of childhood physical abuse. Psychological Bulletin114, 68-69
- Lyons-Ruth K. & Jacobvitz, D. (1999) Attachment disorganization: unresolved loss, relational violence and lapses in behavioral and attentional strategies. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.) Handbook of Attachment. (pp. 520-554). NY: Guilford Press
- Solomon, J. & George, C. (Eds.) (1999). Attachment Disorganization. NY: Guilford Press
- Main, M. & Hesse, E. (1990) Parents’ Unresolved Traumatic Experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Ciccehetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds), Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention (pp161-184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Carlson, E. A. (1988). A prospective longitudinal study of disorganized/disoriented attachment. Child Development 69, 1107-1128
- Lyons-Ruth, K. (1996). Attachment relationships among children with aggressive behavior problems: The role of disorganized early attachment patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64, 64-73
- Lyons-Ruth, K., Alpern, L., & Repacholi, B. (1993). Disorganized infant attachment classification and maternal psychosocial problems as predictors of hostile-aggressive behavior in the preschool classroom. Child Development 64, 572-585
- “Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect”. Childwelfare.gov. Retrieved 2010-08-21.
- Prevent Child Abuse New York. “2007 Child Abuse and Neglect Fact Sheet”.
- American Humane Association. “Emotional Abuse”. Stop Child Abuse.
- “Kids Count Data Center”. The Annie E. Casey Foundation.[citation not found]
- “The AFCARS Report Preliminary FY 2010 Estimates as of June 2011”. http://www.acf.hhs.gov. Retrieved 2011-10-06.
- “Child Maltreatment 2009”. http://www.acf.hhs.gov. Retrieved 2011-10-06.
- Fluke, J. D.; Shusterman, G. R., Hollinshead, D. M., & Yuan, Y.-Y. (2008). “Longitudinal analysis of repeated child abuse reporting and victimization: multistate analysis of associated factors”. Child Maltreatment: 76–88.
- Pecora, P. J., Whittaker, J., Maluccio, A., & Barth, R. (2000). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research. Aldine de Gruyter.
- Wulczyn, F. (2009). “Epidemiological Perspectives on Maltreatment Prevention”. The Future of Children: 39–66.
- Scott, Brenda (1994) Out of Control: Who’s Watching Our Child Protection Agencies? p. 179
- “United States: Serbian Couple Struggles to Get Children Back · Global Voices”. Globalvoicesonline.org. 2011-01-04. Retrieved 2013-11-15.
- “News – U.S.: Serbian couple fights to get children back”. B92. Retrieved 2013-11-15.
- “Press Online :: Press Green”. Pressonline.rs. Retrieved 2013-11-15.
- “The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services – report by Senator Nancy Schaefer, September 25, 2008”.
- State agency hit with rare sanction for taking custody of Spring infants
- KVUE.com, Richardson group: Polygamists’ children are OK April 18, 2008 by Janet St. James / WFAA-TV
- Crotea, Roger (10 May 2008). “Mental health workers rip CPS over sect”. San Antonio Express-news .
- Comptroller Strayhorn Statement On Foster Care Abuse June 23, 2006
- Hill R.B. (2004) Institutional racism in child welfare. In J. Everett, S. Chipungu & B. Leashore (Eds.) Child welfare revisited (pp. 57-76). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Hill, R. B (2006) Synthesis of research on disproportionality in child welfare: An update. Casey-CSSP Alliance for Racial Equity in Child Welfare.
- Wulczyn, F. Lery, B., Haight, J., (2006) Entry and Exit Disparities in the Tennessee Foster Care System. Chapin Hall Discussion Paper.
- National Incidence Study (NIS), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families, (1996)
- Pope, C.E. & Feyerherm, W. (1995) Minorities and the Juvenile Justice System Research Symmary. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- Rogers v. County of San Joaquin, No. 05-16071
- Title 42 United States Code Section 1983
- “Civil Rights Complaint Guide”.
- “Santosky v. Kramer, 455 US 745 – Supreme Court 1982”.
- “In re TJ, 666 A. 2d 1 – DC: Court of Appeals 1995”.
- “South Bay sex-abuse lawsuit: Ex-foster child awarded $30 million”.
- “Estey & Bomberger announces Jury Awards $30 Million in San Jose Molestation Case”.
- “Gresham foster kids abused despite DHS checks”. The Oregonian. 2009-04-04.
- “Abuse in children’s foster care: State officials call for outside review”. The Oregonian. 2009-09-02.
- “Florida Foster Care Child Molestation”.
- “Foster parent, 79, accused of molesting girls in his care”.
- “Child of rape now 9, yet DCF settlement held up”.
- “Florida Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 60”.
- “Florida Senate – 2010”.
- Charlie and Nadine H. v. McGreevey
- “New Jersey (Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine)”.
- “Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine”.
- “Legal Documents (Charlie and Nadine H. v. Corzine)”.
- “Results of Reform”.
- “Order Granting Fees Incurred on Appeal”.
- “U.S. Supreme Court Denies Orange County’s (California) Request”.
- “News10 – Couple still unclear why CPS took their baby”.
- Bakalar, Nicholas (2010-10-11). “Doubts Rise Over Child Protective Service Inquiries”. The New York Times.
- Drake, B. & Jonson-Reid, M. (2007). A response to Melton based on the Best Available Data. Published in: Child Abuse & Neglect, Volume 31, Issue 4, April 2007, Pages 343-360.
- Laird, David and Jennifer Michael (2006). “Budgeting Child Welfare: How will millions cut from the federal budget affect the child welfare system?” Published in: Child Welfare League of America, Children’s Voice, Vol. 15, No. 4 (July/August 2006). Available on-line at: http://www.cwla.org/voice/0607budgeting.htm.
- Pecora, Peter J., James K. Whittaker, Anthony N. Maluccio, with Richard P. Barth and Robert D. Plotnick (1992). The Child Welfare Challenge: Policy, Practice, and Research. NY:Aldine de Gruyter. ISBN .
- Petr, Christopher G. (1998). Social Work with Children and their Families: Pragmatic Foundations. NY:Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-510607-5.
- Scott, Brenda (1994), “Out of Control. Who’s Watching Our Child Protection Agencies?”. Huntington House Publishers. ISBN paper. ISBN hardback.
- MacLaren Hall Child Protection Institution Home Site History of Child Protection in America
- U.S. Children’s Bureau (CB), includes:
- Snowfall – One family’s account of CPS action
- Child Welfare League of America
- Child Shield USA
- American Family Rights
- FightCPS.com – Fighting CPS Prosecution of False Allegations
- – Information and Support for Parents Falsely Accused
- German Federal Office of Statistics, Statistics 1995–2012 outlining German Jugendamt activity
What is being done to establish parental rights ? Parents having children today should understand the truth on how the state has removed parents rights anytime we question doctors or schools on what is best for our child. A parents loses the rights permanently to the medical treatment, education or any decision about the child when we challenge what is best for our children. It is so easy for a judge with no real experience raising children to destroy a family in a matter of minutes. That decision will harm everyone in that family the rest of their lives.
I lost my son to CPS last year. I am not allowed to write to the adoptive parents but if I were allowed, this is what it would say:
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Jones,
Thank you for taking good care of my son. You never will love him as much as I do but I do appreciate the effort. It was unfortunate that you refused to believe our sad AND TRUE HEARTBREAKING STORY because David would like to see his real Mommy and Daddy. Did you ever ask him what HE WANTED?
I hope you have been paying attention to the news lately and the outcry of the people in protest to several horror stories that the news is finally reporting. Now you should doubt me less and consider that it is MORE PROBABLE THAN NOT THAT my son was taken purely for funding of CPS. Just the fact that he is a wonderful, caring, polite and loving little boy should show you all by itself how his mother and I treated him and the kind of parents we are.
Many people have been unaware of the injustices that countless parents experience, unaware of how CPS workers lie and fabricate evidence, unaware that CPS workers disobey court orders, manipulate the Judge, and NEVER EVER LOSE IN COURT. CPS is a criminal organization that must increase it’s child intake every single year to be eligible for funding. I know this because of all of the research my wife and I have done on this agency and because my ex mother-in-law worked for CPS for 35 years, 22 of those years were during my marriage to her daughter, the one who called CPS out of revenge to my second wife who has been able to love me without cheating on me.
I have raised 5 children to adulthood and I am so very grateful that my wife has been by my side faithfully for the 11 years. Dave’s brothers and sisters know that he was never in any danger and that he was even more spoiled than they were. We are so very proud of our kids no matter what they do, we know that life is full of learning by mistakes and that forgiveness is one of keys to a peaceful life. Our children are healthy, productive members of society. They all have made only ONE semi-serious mistake in their young lives yet we are so proud that these mistakes proved to have made a life-changing impact on each one of them. We raised intelligent, law abiding citizens. CPS and the court cohorts claim that the reason they remove children from their parents is to keep them “safe” from “dangerous” people (parents) which is what they made us out to be. But how could we have possibly raised these children to be the people they have become (intelligent, respectful, and productive members of society) without injuries or mental health issues if we were who CPS made us out to be? They didn’t take him because we are bad parents or because they say we are on drugs, there is a very disturbing explanation for it. There is a specific agenda that the government has been following for several years and it seems to fit that they stole our youngest blond haired-blue eyed, adorable little boy. Our adult children do not harbor resentments toward my wife and I but they do resent my first wife and feel that they can’t ever have a normal, drama-free relationship without her trying to ruin it out of jealously. My ex-wife feels that she should always be the center of their attention and goes absolutely nuts when they pay attention to anyone or anything else. All of our children have become or are becoming, productive members of society. Due to the bias created by my ex-wife and her mother, CPS only took my second wife’s children even though we still had one older child who was under 18 at the time. That was the ex-mother-in-law’s grandchild.We loved him so much that my wife and I risked our life and freedom to prevent him from getting hurt in foster care.
Mr. Jones, are you a reasonable man? Can I speak to you, man to man? I am a good dad and all my children have been raised with patience and a kind heart. Don’t you have a good and decent heart? Would you let anyone separate you from your child when you love your child more than life itself? This is where I stand. All his siblings know how much love and support I gave to each of them and I would do it again and again. I will see my son again someday and he will know how hard we tried to save him from CPS, how much we love him and miss him and he will know that we contacted you and you refused to allow him to see us. He won’t be happy with that, who would?
If your heart was truly into raising my son, David, to be healthy and happy then he should never be cut off from his siblings. They all miss him and love him so very much. He is their little brother and I know from the tapes we sent you that you also know how much we cherish him. The youngest always always gets the most spoiled. So he is slightly a drama king but he is great just the way he is. That is because of being loved and encouraged to learn. Do not be mean or foul spirited or quick tempered I beg you. He will be curious about his family and I will not turn away no matter what. We accept you into our lives because of what has happened. You should accept us into yours simply because we are the reason you have been blessed with him. We truly want only what is best for David. You can’t ignore his past so embrace it. He will be much better adjusted for life. If you really feel we are so bad with out getting to know us that is not a good way to be. I know you have seen just from David’s loving ways that we are good parents. Good parents are always striving to be great parents.
David will get to know his family later in life so if you do not want resentments then you should get to know all of us. You never know, you might like us. We do have friends you know. Normal friends who don’t judge us. I love all my children and I, like most parents, would give my life to help my child. If you could just open your eyes and find out what CPS does to families and children you may figure it out that we are not bad people. We have just been in bad situations making decisions out of fear. I pray you are never involved with CPS, you will get very angry with CPS and that judge who clearly is corrupt.
My son is my life and I pray you treat him kindly and lovingly as I would. David is a big part of my life and I did not give him up he was kidnapped just to fill some kind of angry hole my ex wife has in her heart. I would never take David from you, I hope you know that, not because of the police but because I want David to have a calm happy childhood, all children deserve that. If our intentions were to “kidnap” him from you and your wife we wouldn’t have sent you that letter. Our intentions were always to keep David safe from the kidnappers. Not allowing him to see us just because we asked alone, I can understand. But we sent you proof, you’ve been on our website, you saw videos, you looked up corrupt CPS and I know you found out that a lot of parents are crying out for help against these monsters. We offered for you to meet us first, without David, so you wouldn’t put him in “danger”. But all you did was call CPS and file a restraining order. Thanks a lot for being such a good human being.
Soon enough he will be an adult and stress is a battle then. CPS puts good families through this kind of stress and it must have a long lasting effect on children. CPS will have to answer to God for that.
I love my son and if you look around here you might learn a little more about how CPS works. You can not ignore these things or say they are not true because every one of these stories are real. Any parent who fights for their child and never gives up should have never have lost that child. CPS pushes that information aside because family means nothing but a pay check to these people.
Please tell David that we love him so very much, give him hugs and kisses please, our hearts ache for him..
That is what I would say to the adoptive parents of my son if I were allowed to.
Someone recently mentioned to me that the average person feels that the posts on this blog have an ANGRY UNDERTONE. Oh, no, really? Because I thought it was obvious how happy go lucky we are. NOT, YOU’RE DAMN RIGHT we are ANGRY! Since we ARE NOT VIOLENT PEOPLE AND DO NOT BELIEVE THAT IT IS RIGHT TO HURT ANYONE PHYSICALLY OR MENTALLY, we simply do a lot of barking and it makes us feel better.
What surprised me was that they used the word, “undertone”. All this time we thought we were making it more obvious than that. We are angry damn it, and we are trying to shout about it as loud as we can without being slanderous. We do not say anything that is not true, we do not state facts which we cannot back up with proof or evidence. We are informing the public, we are educating the public, anything that is an opinion is stated so. This blog is a journal which we allow people to view. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. It’s your choice.
But try to imagine, If someone called the cops while you were pregnant, and said that you had a meth lab in your house and the cops come out and check and say, “Obviously this was a false report.” and have CPS come out and find nothing either. Then that person gets furious that her evil plan failed so she tries ten times harder. She calls CPS over and over and over and over (40 times) while you are in labor, calling the her friends who work in the hospital too, telling them that my baby “was going to die if you let it go home with them”. So, CPS comes and creates a reason to take your baby from you and you have to watch THEM go home with your newborn baby and you HAVE NOT DONE A THING WRONG! Well, how well would that sit with you?
Maybe for a while you would be angry towards that person specifically, not innocent people who believed that caller and was ensuring the safety of your child.
But wait, then you find out that those “innocent” people preyed upon you and your children simply because they could. These people, whom the public believes really care about kids, falsify documents in order to justify the removal of your children. How do you feel now? Just a little bump in the road? A challenging situation? Ok, sure, so you go out of your way to prove the documents are falsified and you present it to your court appointed attorney. You’re feeling a little exemplified and you’re thinking, “Ok everything is going to be alright, they will see I am innocent, they will go away now.”
But wait, your attorney tells you that it is “irrelevant” because your kids are already placed back into your home but, in order to keep your kids in your home, you are told that you have no choice but to submit to an “Amended Petition” which has stricken all the bullcrap allegations and you only have to give in a little. But you also have to participate in their “programs” and “services”. You think, “Alright, I would do anything for my kids and what the heck, maybe I’ll learn something.” Maybe you are left feeling a little irritated but the situation is somewhat tolerable.
Then they switch social workers and that person comes to your home and talks to you. This worker brings up EVERYTHING in the original Petition that was stricken. So, you’re like, “No, I proved that wrong, we are not guilty of that.” So that worker writes that down in her notes and talks to her supervisor and then calls you later and demands that you drug test immediately even though you are in drug program and testing negative all the time. A few days later the worker calls you and tells you that your test was “diluted” and that her supervisor considers that a “dirty” test and that you are in “denial” because you had mentioned that the allegations in the petition were false and that puts your children “at risk”.
This “diluted” test forces you to continue in your drug class for an extra 8 months and continue going to “group” 3 times a week. Your counselor was nice to you at first but after a talk with the social worker, she becomes your worst enemy. She demonstrates an obvious dislike towards you and your requests to change to a different counselor are denied. You try to be as genuine as possible even though you have to try to act like you have a “problem” which you are “recovering” from or else they will drop you out of “treatment” or tell your social worker that you continue to be in “denial”. [Later, you find out that it just so happens that she personally knows the PERSON WHO MADE THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS TO THE HOTLINE]. This counselor often encourages the entire group to berate you one at a time, your only friends are the ones you give rides to. How it going? Feeling OK? Just wait, there’s more.
The next time you go to court everyone treats you like some kind of fuck up but you’re saying, “No, it wasn’t a dirty test, how can they do that?” and the Judge gives you a lecture and tells you to “keep your mouth shut”.
[A few years later, when you receive a copy of the transcript, you notice the date that the Court said you tested “positive” for is not the date of the alleged “diluted” test so you go through the Court’s copy of the report and find a drug test that was not attached to the original report that was given to you at the time. Now, how do you feel? Oooh, I bet you’re getting ticked off now!]
So, finally, after a year, the worker tells you she’s closing the case, you don’t have to test and you don’t have to go to court. Suddenly, 3 weeks later she’s calling and demanding that you drug test immediately. But you’re out of state helping a friend. Now you are forced to leave your friend, at a time she needs you the most, to go and take a drug test for CPS when you were told that the case was closed? Now is your anger building up or are your ecstatic with joy and happiness? The caller is calling again and she is bound and determined to ruin your life and CPS fakes another hair follicle test document and you are forced to go to an in-patient rehab for 3 months. The counselors at the rehab are nice people and advocate on your behalf but when you get out you are forced to go to another program which is a year long. One thing after another, you have to deal with it gracefully and with a smile. Like having your knuckles smacked back when you were in Catholic school and having to say, “Thank you Sister, may I have another?” The final straw is when that program submits a glowing report about you to CPS then changes their mind because the caller kept calling and the mother called some co-worker or colleague CPS made the program director change their reports (and your drug test results). oh, you are looking a little flush, are you alright? i know, maybe this is too much at one time, you should turn on a fan or the a/c.
There’s more, a lot more, that was done to us which contributes to our undertone. Some say that we have a problem, that we are ignorant, that we are in denial, that we constantly “blame others” for our own failures and behavior and some even say that we are “dangerous”! To them I say, “……….” well I am not going to publish that. (You know that it must be really really bad for ME not to publish something and I think that maybe now you kinda get it.)
And not only has this been done to YOU and YOUR family, you see others going through the same thing BUT TWICE AS BAD. I THINK THAT CPS AND THEIR COURT COHORTS TAKE ADVANTAGE OF PEOPLE FOR THE FUN OF IT AS WELL AS FOR THEIR PAYCHECK. THEY ARE GETTING SO DRASTIC WITH THEIR ACTIONS, COVER-UPS AND STORIES THEY TELL THE KIDS TO MAKE THEM HATE THEIR PARENTS.
I miss my son so much. I wonder every single day if he even remembers me. I treated my son like he was a precious gift. I took excellent care of him. There is no good reason that I can NEVER SEE HIM EVER AGAIN!. I am 45 years old. By the time he is 18 I will be almost 60 years old. An OLD LADY. He won’t even recognize me. I will not be very pleasing to the eye. I may even be dead. That REALLY gets me. My DAD is 76 years old. Donnelly will definitely never be able to see his POP POP ever again. He won’t be able to hear his stories of when I was little or how my mom and dad met (DONNELLY WAS NAMED AFTER THESE PEOPLE: DON + ELLIE=DONNELLY). I bet Donnelly still remembers my mom even though she has been passed away since 2010, there was something special that made those two connect immediately. Donnelly has an inalienable right to his biological family and he is being denied that by people claiming to love him.
I still cry every single day. My heart hurts constantly. I often feel life is not worth living. Sometimes I hear him. He’s calling me, “Mommy, mommy, mommy, mommy, mommeeeeee!” It feels like he’s scared and lonely. I am not crazy, many biological parents experience this. The feeling of loss gets worse as time goes by. If people had any idea of how it feels I guarantee you this stealing of children would cease and parents would be allowed to at least see their babies once in a while. Remember people, IF YOU BELIEVE IN GOD, I MEAN IF YOU ARE NOT JUST FAKING IT BECAUSE IT LOOKS GOOD TO GO TO CHURCH AND TO SAY CHRISTIAN THINGS, then you know that GOD is judging you and if you don’t know it YOU ARE THE ONE IN DENIAL.
CREDIT WAS GIVEN TO SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE CONTENTS OF DONNELLYJUSTICE. STILL THEY WERE ASKED TO STOP EXPRESSING THEIR (OUR) RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH ABOUT WHAT THAT COURT IS DOING TO THEIR FAMILY.
AS FOR ME AND MY WIFE, THAT SAME COURT AND JUDGE STOLE OUR SON AND ADOPTED HIM OUT. THIS IS THE ONLY PERSONAL PROTECTION WE HAVE AGAINST THE CORRUPTION AND THE KIDNAPPING BY CPS, JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS. I WILL SEE THIS JUDGE OFF THE BENCH.
Maybe after he retires but I will still see him off the bench. My wife is just wonderful at finding case-law that sets a precedent. Her dedication to fighting for her son is different from mine and that is what makes me so proud of her. We have had so many people telling us thank you for giving them the information so desperately needed helping to beat their CPS cases in every state except California. There is a complete disregard for law in this state and especially in this county (Riverside) What these court cohorts just don’t seem to get in their heads is, I cannot be intimidated- ever. I can even face the threat of losing my life, this is too important and you corrupt people in bed with CPS have stolen my son. So now you go ahead and do whatever you have to do because in the end, I am still proud of who I am and who my wife is as well. We are making a stand for FAMILIES IN THE NAME OF OUR SON DONNELLY THE ONE YOU GAVE UP FOR ADOPTION because we stood up to your bias, unfair and CORRUPT system. You are doing it to honest and decent parents, why? I did not take children and sell them for government funding ever. But what I have done and will keep doing is continue to get your funding removed by being completely honest about your court practices to the OIG and other agencies, until my son comes home.
Everyday I am on this planet is a blessing from God and I do feel truly blessed to have such wonderful children (6 of them, but CPS only stole 1 of them. I was capable of raising 5 others to adulthood without ANY major injuries or hospitalizations, my children are capable, working adults, productive members of society. Isn’t that the GOAL of raising children? How the hell can I have raised them to be who and what they are now if I was abusive or put them “at risk”?) The lord has given and he has taketh away. I should have so much to be happy for. I expect nothing and I cherish everyday he allows me to continue to fight for children and parents. Threatening me will do no good. The mistake that was already made was not killing me after kidnapping my child.
Suggesting that it is expected that site be taken down, you should make sure that you have the RIGHT person this time. Now ask me again to take my site down. Do you really think I will? The last time I was told to take a blog down I created 4 more sites. The data my wife is collecting about CPS, DCFS, (and every other acronym out there), social workers’, attorneys’ and judges’ history of crimes, failures and lawsuits is growing and has already grown so large we may need volunteers to help us. The motivation of parents that have had their children kidnapped by CPS is either completely give up and become a lump of emotional coal or it motivates them to become absolutely obsessed with exposing, indicting, describing, yelling, screaming, informing, litigating every single thing that was wrongfully done to them. My wife and I, obviously, are not lumps of coal.
The sacrifice parents make raising a child and the personal investment could never have a dollar amount value placed on it.. This is an investment of the heart and life over time and any parent who enjoys being a parent as we do, so very much so, can’t ever let that go. Anyone who knows my wife and I, know without any doubt how much we care about and love our son Donnelly as well as our other children, Our children give us meaning and purpose. Our friends see how much we hurt and know we will never give up. They see our obsession, its all we talk about, my wife is always aware that we may be annoying and tries to be considerate by talking about other things once in a while but the conversation always ends up back on the subject. Many people express that if CPS tried to take away their kid that it would be over their dead body. We felt that way too however, when you are put in a position where they have lied to the police so they take your child at GUNPOINT, your “dead body” becomes literal. People have no idea how truly corrupt these judges are and the dollar is all they care about. These Judges honestly do not care about the children in their community or anything that happens to them. In our case, CPS and the court cohorts went way out of their way to terminate our rights and prevent our family from getting custody, or even ever being able to see or speak to him, then DID NOT TAKE THE MOST SIMPLE PRECAUTIONS TO ENSURE THAT THE ADOPTIVE PARENT’S INFORMATION BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. So, once they were assured the AFSA, CAPTA and other funds, they cared no more. These Judges know children get abused, killed or neglected all the time in CPS care and even by the adoptive parents. A babysitter will never care for a child the same as biological parents. Don’t misunderstand me, there are parents who are neglectful or abusive but there are far less of them than they try to fool the public into believing but everyone I know agrees they would not want CPS in their home ever, our children are more important than anything. Just this statement alone says so much about our lives. The devastation CPS leaves in their wake is truly more than a parent should endure. Without our friends and family we don’t think we could have made it. The cruelty in which CPS when they relentlessly fabricate stories about many parents is overwhelming. When you experience it for yourself you find that this has been going on for decades yet still swept under the rug.
CPS generates money and is shared with other county departments via the general fund so they are supported by the police, the Board of Supervisors and other county officials. CPS uses the same tactics with every family as I have learned by interviewing people on the courthouse steps but since the police depend on the money from the general fund, they will not do anything about the criminal behavior of social workers. The amount of money the Judge gets for each child varies in each county with Riverside being the most secretive which is why the audit is taking a while. Anyone who has any evidence of the falsification of evidence and perjury must contact the Office of the Inspector General, who oversees social security funding (Title IV-E), and hold them accountable for auditing Riverside County or any county in the US. All you need to do is compare the transcript to the minute orders, attach your evidence of their forgery and perjury, and send it to them. The link was right there. COUNTIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY BACK THE IV FUNDS. I am sure that this will be greatly appreciated by the Directors since the quality of children’s lives are PARAMOUNT right? I couldn’t have felt good sleeping at night without helping the Riverside DPSS/CPS Director, Susan Loew, who began working for CPS in 1999 in the FINANCES & SERVICES department, by ensuring that every dime be accounted for and used for the needs of children. That is the objective right Ms. Loew? I feel bad for not helping sooner with, you know, First 5 auditing, I know how much heat you have taken about that mismanagement and being reprimanded by the Grand Jury and all.
This country can’t survive much more of this corrupt government. I will continue to do everything I can no matter what . If anything happens to me to change what I do, it isn’t me. God Bless everyone and keep up the pressure. William R. Burns for http://www.donnellyjustice.me
Its TRUE! A former Riverside County Juvenile Dependency Court Judge has a history of failing to obey red signal /lights and a Defense Panel attorney for children has a history of being cited (twice) for failing to yield to pedestrians!
We have established a well read blog in Riverside county now and have about 10,000 followers and we have been consistently doubling about every 3 months, A message to the “Defense Panel” over there on Technology Drive, is your definition of saving abused and neglected children defined as: “the act of allowing children to be taken from their families and put into a strange place with strange people where their chances of maltreatment are greatly increased“? Is your definition of a safer community defined as: “that of which 85% percent of these children end up committing felonies and going to prison, getting out on parole and committing more crimes“? Is your definition of family defined as: “a group of non-related people are forced to live together unattached and unable to donate organs to each other when medically necessary to save a life“?
Your malfeasance causes children to lose faith in anything sacred, especially family. Your pathological views and addiction to “fixing people” causes irreversible and permanent damage to approximately 30,000 Riverside County families each year. Some of these families may not be your interpretation of perfect but that is up to the family to decide not YOU. The destruction of families is how you earn a living. You all need to get right or be removed from society and locked away to protect the community from your wickedness for you have failed at protecting children.
So from now on I am going to run background checks on you and every cohort of yours. When I find even an unpaid parking ticket, or a citation for running a red light, I am going to direct a lot of attention to it and anything else I can dig up. You owe these people and it is time you start doing your job. We will be conducting interviews as well.
I know you don’t like me but if you did your job I wouldn’t be here digging up you life. I see things that you are doing right now that is disgusting beyond comprehension. I am looking for anything I can get on any SOCIAL WORKER in Riverside County that could be true upon a preponderance. It is time our officials and courts STOP hurting children and start being accountable. You can start with following your own statutes, codes, rules, regulations and behaving like normal people who do their job. If you don’t like your job GET A NEW ONE. I am sick to death at watching CPS submit faked documents and alleged letters without objection by anyone. What is not real is faked so you all have lost all touch with reality. You and the county make money on the destruction of the family.
Parents have to watch the most cruel terrorism in existence, the kidnapping of their children. Who the hell does this Judge think he is sitting on that Title IV-E funded wooden horse?. I state this as truth and the absolute truth so help me God. There is no point in taking an OATH anymore because it doesn’t mean shit. This Judge prevents and denies exculpatory evidence the parents have, overrules legally sustainable objections, fails to ensure the rights of parents AND the children, ignores and allows obviously fabricated evidence into the record, makes orders which CPS is allowed to be in contempt of, and will enjoy putting on an elaborate show during the termination of parental rights hearing by grossly overdramatizing cases for the benefit of the prospective adoptive parent.
Taking money for the 3 year term on the CPS bench is illegal due to the fact that everyone, including the Judge, is paid by the County of Riverside who is a party these cases. Many things going on in your courtroom are illegal and we are letting people know about it. Oddly, we all are hoping and praying for you all to gain a conscious. However, I expect that you will have your friends do something to harass me but I do not really care because you have already sentenced me to a life of loss and heartache because I chose to try and protect my son from CPS. You didn’t even notice, or maybe you did and allowed it anyway, another mans criminal record into evidence as if it were my record. I will not just stand by while you continue to destroy families so you are able to afford your Audi’s and your 7 bedroom (empty) houses with the lives you destroy. You must be held accountable for your actions. My right as an American citizen is to hold people like you accountable for using the bench on which you sit as your own RACKETEERING BUSINESS.
Dear HEARING OFFICER WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE COUNTY TO ADOPT ALL OF THE COUNTY’S REQUESTED “FINDINGS AND ORDERS” WITHOUT REGARD TO THE TRUTH OF THE FACTS AND WITHOUT SUSTAINING ANY OBJECTIONS (IN THE RARE CASE THAT THEY ARE MADE BY A PRIVATE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING A PARENT OR OTHER FAMILY MEMBER), AND PLAYING FAVORITES BY SUSTAINING EVERY OBJECTION MADE BY THE COUNTY:
I have some thoughts that you need to hear, I am expressing this by and through my United States Constitutional Right to FREE SPEECH.
If anyone reading this has an opinion and would like to comment, that is also YOUR RIGHT, so exercise it!
Now, I wish I could say that you are completely ignorant, unaware of the strings attached to you like a puppet. I wish I could say that you are being manipulated and/or coerced into doing what you do. Sadly, I cannot say either.
View original post 1,315 more words
I guess this means I haven’t stopped. Taking my son away just so you could put money in your pockets, is the reason I will never stop exposing CPS. We are continually looking for tips, links, or eye witness reports of the UN-American activities by CPS, County Counsel, or any of the lawyers that pretend to care about children in court and not do a thing. My attorney did not ask any questions that would increase the credibility as to how we raise our son. Instead he asked questions that played into the stereotype profiling. These attorneys don’t fight for us in CPS court they feed us to the wolves, I felt in the CPS courtroom the entire case was choreographed. Letting the adoptive parents sit in the court just topped it off when my rights were not even terminated this is the strongest indication that everything was planned.
have had some great people willing to study the law about these CPS cases and this has helped them so much. The books are there so is anyone needs legal guides, law books, we have numerous links and places to get books on the law for free. I want all parents to have the chance that was stolen from my wife and I by some very heartless people who care about no no one only money. Now that I have experience first hand, I have truly experienced the worst in man kind. I never thought the entire court system of CPS would sell children or get involved where they should not be. To tell you the truth CPS should never end taking any child unless a child has gotten hurt from neglect. Based on all the overwhelming evidence against CPS and the JV court system it is only a matter of time for these people to be looking for a job. SELLING CHILDREN FOR FEDERAL MONEY , A child that gets hurt or killed doesn’t matter to CPS or these judges, I will never stop exposing this court system.
I will never shut up, I will continue to fight until my death because it is not right on every level that a man would pass a law to take away a child and allow a company to profit from it. The people who pretend that it wouldn’t become corrupt are freaking kidding them selves. The lawyers that work for CPS could never find another job because they know what they have done by pretending that there is any validity to CPS at all anymore and I am not sure there ever was and I have been around these people for a very long time. They came into my house and only picked the children from my second wife and I but left the children from my first wife who’s mother was very well established with that very CPS office and no one see”s the connection. HOW OBVIOUSLY CORRUPT CAN YOU BE TO UPHOLD THIS CRIME AGAINST PARENTS AND STEAL THEIR CHILD is everyone in the court system completely corrupt? Don’t you people ever wonder what would happen if this happened to you.
What I find outrageous these days, that people still have such a lack of morality that they will pretend they haven’t heard of CPS stealing children from good homes. The show I had to sit through today was so insulting and everyone knew it. At this day in age that a person would have to sit through a court proceeding and listen to people rob you blind. They should just use a gun and kill me, it would be easier. My son was stolen and from a good home and everyone thinks I am just going to watch it happen without making the whole world aware of it, not this father, A Lawyer who did his research would know only a person who truly cares about his child would continue to fight at all cost not someone who is just trying to justify things.
How can anyone think I would go to all this effort of finding case law and research of CPS crimes to make this stuff up? That is the crazy argument I had to listen to today. This is to cruel to be made up. If for a second you think CPS isn’t like this, don’t be lazy, look it up. Look up the thousands of parents still fighting for their children even though low life attorney’s who know better still continue to tell people, I don’t have any evidence that CPS steals children, I can’t face up to what I did, or can’t deal with my responsibility for the things I may have done. How much more evidence will be enough to WAKE PEOPLE up OR tell the American people to get off their ass and face up to the fact that their children are being stolen and sold by the single biggest trafficker of children in history.
People have been told countless times and still everyone keeps saying it won’t ever happen to me. Then why are 800,000 that is eight hundred thousand children a year in the united states are stolen out of their homes and the news doesn’t report it. Now go ahead ask me how I know this the Government keeps totals and in order to get funding it must increase by 5 percent a year to set the budget for next year. I know this stuff because it happened to me and every time I see another child get taken from a good home. I ask myself what is it going to take to get people to wake up and fight back, I am only one person. I am not asleep, I pay attention. I know the TV is more interesting and I will not get a second thought until another child is stolen, a child you would protect at any cost right, and yet you don’t even have a chance to fight for your child because you don’t know who the threat is yet.and these people will ruin anyone.
My answer to the attorney’s who say I don’t own up to my responsibility. My answer for you, not only do I deal with my responsibility but I deal with your irresponsibility to your client and industry that you so graciously take money from even when you know a child is suffering the consequence. One thing I was taught as a child and I would have taught my child if given the chance, never give up the things you know are right even if told to do so. This is how people become nothing under NAZI boot heals, I would rather die for my principles than cater to corruption. You will say something typical again but I will not go away their is something far more important here than me shutting my mouth. PARENTS ARE LOSING THEIR CHILDREN and until attorney’s stand up and say no I will not help you steal another child this country is going to end up COMPLETELY ROTTEN and you judges out there who approve this corrupt way of life. Don’t you want to live in a place of decency and made up of good people? Why are you letting this happen when you know it is wrong. Just because I am not at the top of my class or a judge doesn’t mean I am not well grounded in life. I know who I am and I know what is right so you go ahead do what you will to me, but I have to face my maker alone, I know what she will say to me, so do what you have to do, I am the man I want to be.
If you second guess anything I am saying you will lose. Ask your self what I will lose or gain by telling you this? The answer nothing, they have already taken it and I would be lying if I said I don’t get a satisfaction out of helping parents and children to stay or get away from CPS. When attorneys have beaten CPS they have lost their children, that is why a good attorney will go up against CPS if he has children or close friends who do. If you think I am lying look it up the information is out there, people don’t make up things like that, it is to horrible to be made up. CPS WILL TAKE WHAT THEY WANT IF YOUR CHILD BECOMES THE TARGET.
We were up against another show for CPS again to day and they will not stop trying to shut me up. They can’t because I tell the truth. CPS has been indicted so many times by the grand jury, investigated by the FBI and still people will say I don’t have any evidence to say the things I am saying. If this is you welcome to earth because you just got here. On this planet CPS steals children. WAKE UP PEOPLE.
It is now legal for CPS to steal your children and sell them for Federal money because there are plenty of unscrupulous people who find out and are just fine with knowing the truth and will even file a restraining order against the parents to help cover it up. as a matter of fact I know of a couple who adopted a child, I wont mention any names but these people found out the truth and instead of contact the parents and saying sorry you were wronged, and it is obvious you were wronged because you keep staying in there and fighting any parent who keeps fighting against those odds the just might deserve a little courtesy.
The parent I am talking about wrote a letter to the adoptive parents asking just to be able to visit or to make sure the child knew his parent didn’t give up on him, because the child deserves to know his parent didn’t just let him go, he was taken. Amazing as it is, these people stated that the birth parents couldn’t except what they did and just deal with it. WOULD THEY JUST WALK AWAY FROM A HUMAN BEING WHO DESERVES TO KNOW THE TRUTH? I bet they would just walk away. You know, I bet it wouldn’t be to hard to except if the parents didn’t have absolute proof that the CPS worker submitted a criminal record of another man in the same city with the same name but different middle name,and 10 years older that would be their first clue that the parents weren’t lying.
You see there is a moral struggle here inside of this person. I bet he would like to just walk away and not run a back ground check on everyone in his sons life but bet he won’t. You see I know him almost like it was myself speaking. I will bet he will end up winning his law suit against CPS because it is right and like his mom always said, “what is right is right and nothing can change that not ever”.
The part about this story I think is disgusting, the attorney sat in that court room and this attorney is very well informed on CPS and he knows just how bad they really are and yet he still lied to his clients. He way over charged them for a proceeding that they could have just represented themselves. Like I said these people that had their son stolen they are not stupid and won’t do anything to cause their son or the parents any harm.
One thing that I have to make abundantly clear and I hope everyone understands this:
If you ever adopt a child CPS will treat you just like the person they took the child from in the first place if you ever call them for help, they will not take it as if you need help, they will take it as a sign that you are their next target for funding. I am not just talking hot air, I know these people and know what they do. If you think just because they helped you adopt a child once they will always be their for you they won’t. The one thing you need to know is CPS is never to be trusted EVER. These people will not only destroy you but they will destroy your reputation, your business and your life all to make a few hundred thousand in federal funds.
I have stated it so many times to people and until CPS is shut down I will not shut up. I owe it to my son and every single child stolen to be loud about it so this “legal” kidnapping STOPS. People don’t trust government at all but they will pretend to trust CPS when they put a child in their home. Is this self deception
I wish I could warn the entire country about CPS but even if I did there are still people who will say that could never be me. You know it doesn’t have to be you CPS will just use some other person’s criminal record. Do you think if everyone in this country just woke up and said, “Know what? I will treat my child perfect forever.” Do you think CPS would go out of business? NO they wouldn’t. But they would grab very adoptable children by claiming the parents were drug addicts. Let me ask you, do you or have you ever taken prescription pain killers? How about Xanax? And did you drive? Drive with a child in the car? How about just simply being at home taking care of the kids? Well, if you got in an accident and they drug tested you it would be positive for opiates or benzodiazapines.and you could be charged with driving under the influence and your child taken away or if someone made a false report to the hotline and came to the house and asked you to take a mouth swab drug test, they would take your kids and you would have to do all of their programs. Do you drink? Does your spouse drink? Have you consumed alcohol while your children were around? What if you were entertaining and your child was playing or skateboarding and fell and had to go to the hospital? Then when you get there and speak to the doctor he smells alcohol on your breath and calls CPS. They would take your kid and make you go through their substance abuse classes, parenting classes, counseling, anger management and whatever else they throw at you. And you STILL MIGHT NOT GET YOUR KID BACK if they are good kids and “very adorable and adoptable”. This is real and it happens to thousands and thousands of people.
I tell you what I don’t have to say anymore. I will give you a link to a site CPS social workers talk to each other some times they don’t disguise what is said and you be the judge of what they say. It will change you out look on raising children. The site is called http://www.socialjerk.com People please just listen and except this fact. Don’t call CPS and ever expect a good outcome, these people are hired because of their ability to disconnect and not use their better judgement, A type personality, aggressive, argumentative , antisocial, sociopaths and most don’t have children, people with children do not last at CPS because they become conscious of what they do to other parents. I don’t like if truly in this since to be right. I give the information out tell you where to look and still people say, I am lying.. If someone is giving information before you call them a liar, check out what they are saying, It might save you from losing your son. I am telling everyone not one person, so not trust these people because you can’t even trust them to keep information private.
I truly wish Riverside County would get a judge of moral fiber with family values, if this doesn’t happen soon than any parent who goes before a CPS is getting a sentence far worse than death. I have such a hard time believing the world is this evil. Separating family is such a cruel thing to do that I can not follow any decision by these corrupt unmoral criminals who would sell another persons children. This punishment no person deserves and I will do what ever the lord has planed for me. Bless these people for they know not what they do. We love you Donnelly.
Donnelly is our baby boy and any parent who feels the way we do about our children is a wonderful parent. No judge could ever take that from us. We are gentle, loving parents and we will face the terrorism of Child Protective Services to our deaths. There is no reason on Gods green earth why we can not see our son. The lies of these social workers who have stolen our child will come out. Any person who does the things that have been done to us to steal our child is not a person of decency or moral fiber and should be in prison. I have no reason to hide my head in shame because I know who I am, and I wouldn’t want to be anyone else. I like who I am, I know CPS social worker Antione Coley doesn’t like who he is, this man has lied to everyone to take my son.
My children are my life and no man shall take that away, God bless the parents who keep on going even after CPS has stolen their child.. We will see you again Donnelly love Dad.
A woman I know with a current open CPS case recently sent a complaint letter to her social worker’s supervisor. She also sent copies to: the Director of DPSS, Deputy Director, her attorney, the state DPSS, the FFA, her child’s counselor, the Attorney General and the FBI. She didn’t send one to the worker. The first call she got was from the Deputy Director. The second was from the worker who left a voicemail TELLING HER THAT SHE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO GO SEE ______ (A DOCTOR) AND GET ON MEDICATION AS IT WAS REQUIRED! My friend has had two psychological evaluations and has been seeing two separate counselors for many months now. None of these professionals feel my friend has any mental illness or condition let alone need medication. The social worker who told my friend that she “had no choice” to go get on medication is Sonia Correa. I put her name out there because she is absolutely wretched! Not just due to this incident but because she is a sociopath liar and perpetrating malicious and intentional emotional distress upon my friend and her daughter. Maybe Sonia Correa is not even human, she speaks in monotone and forgets how to use a telephone for months on end.
This prompted me to look into the possibility that there are mentally hazardous conditions in the field of social work that turns people’s brains into a psychosis-malfunctioning blob. I found some socializing sites that all parents with CPS cases should check out, just to know how these people think and get some insight into why social workers are such jerks and act like they hate you. I am not saying that we should sympathize with these people or have any respect for the ones that are sociopaths. Just remember, my strategy is that being able to think “like” the enemy will eventually beat your enemy. Please feel free to comment on our site rather than the social worker’s site if you have any anti-social worker comments. If you have any suggestions or know of other sites that give insight to the mind of a social worker, please email me at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
[Correa is not in the picture above, I got it from Google Images. If you are one of these people and you object to your picture being posted herein, contact me at the email below and I will gladly remove it)
LINK TO SOCIAL WORKER SOCIAL SITE:
UPDATE: MORE SOCIAL WORKER BLOGS: